Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¹æ»ç¼º µ¿À§¿ø¼Ò¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ 5±Þ¿Íµ¿º¹ÇÕ·¹ÁøÀÇ º¯¿¬´©Ãâ¿¡ °üÇÑ ½ÇÇèÀû ¿¬±¸

In vitro study of Marginal Leakage of Class V Compostie Resins

´ëÇѼҾÆÄ¡°úÇÐȸÁö 1989³â 16±Ç 1È£ p.208 ~ 217
¹Úâ¼ö, ÀÌÁø¿ë,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¹Úâ¼ö (  ) - °æÈñ´ëÇб³
ÀÌÁø¿ë (  ) - °æÈñ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

°á·Ð
ÀúÀÚ´Â ¹ß°ÅµÈ ÀüÄ¡ ¹× ¼Ò±¸Ä¡ 72°³ÀÇ Ä¡°üºÎ¿¡ 5±Þ¿Íµ¿À» Çü¼ºÇÏ°í ´ëÁ¶±º¿¡´Â
Hi-Aristaloy ±×¸®°í ½ÇÇ豺¿¡´Â Clearfil F¥±¿Í Microrest AP, PrismafilÀ» ÃæÀüÇÏ°í ¹æ»ç¼º
µ¿À§¿ø¼ÒÀÎ 45Ca¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ÀÚ±â¹æ»ç¹ýÀ¸·Î 1, 7, ¹× 30ÀÏÈÄ °¢°¢ÀÇ ¿Íµ¿º¯¿¬
ºÎ¿¡¼­ º¯¿¬´©Ãâ Á¤µµ¸¦ ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿© ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº °á°ú¸¦ ¾ò¾ú´Ù.
1. ´ëÁ¶±ºÀÎ Hi-Aristaloy±º¿¡¼­ º¯¿¬´©Ãâ Á¤µµ´Â ½Ã°£ÀÌ °æ°úÇÔ¿¡ µû¶ó °¨¼ÒÇÏ¿´´Ù.
2. ¸ðµç ½ÇÇ豺¿¡¼­ ½Ã°£ÀÌ °æ°úÇÔ¿¡ µû¶ó º¯¿¬´©Ãâ Á¤µµ´Â Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
3. È­ÇÐÁßÇÕÇü±º°£ÀÇ ºñ±³¿¡¼­ Microrest AP±ºÀº Clearfil F¥±±ºº¸´Ù º¯¿¬´©Ãâ Á¤µµ°¡ ¸¹
¾Ò´Ù.
4. ´ëÁ¶±º¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °¢ ½ÇÇè°£ÀÇ º¯¿¬´©Ãâµµ´Â 1ÀÏ¿¡¼­´Â ¸ðµÎ Åë°èÇÐÀûÀ¸·Î À¯ÀǼºÀÌ ÀÖ¾ú
À¸³ª 7ÀÏ°ú 30ÀÏ¿¡¼­´Â Microrest AP±º¸¸ÀÌ À¯ÀǼºÀÌ ÀÖ¾ú´Ù.(P<0.05)
#ÃÊ·Ï#
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the marginal leakage of class V composite
resin restoration by autoradiographic method.
The cavities were filled with Hi-Aristaloy and three composite resin, the composite
resin system used on this study were Clearfil F¥±, which was chemically cured with
conventional filler, Microrest AP, which was chemically cured with microfiller and
Prismafil, which was light-cured type resin, All procedure were directed by
manufacturers recommendations, All specimen were thermocycled by alternatly
immersing them in water at 47¡É and 60¡É for 100 cycles after 1 day, 7 days and 30
days and then they were immersed in 4mmCi / ml 45Ca solution for 2
hours, and sectioned buccolingually through the restoration with diamond disk. The
sectioned surface of the tooth was placed on an ultraspeed periapical dental x-ray film
for 17 hours to produce the autoradiograph.
The following results were obtained.
1. Marginal leakages of Hi-Aristaloy group were decreased with time.
2. Marginal leakages of all experimental groups were increased with time.
3. In comparing between chemically cured resin, marginal leakage of Microrest AP,
which was microfiller type show more than Clearfil F¥±, which was conventional filler
type resin.
4. Marginal leakage of each experimental group compared with control group show
significant differences in all 1 day group and Microrest AP group in 7 & 30 days group.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI